Confirm the governing requirements
Determine whether the protocol must be prospectively registered and which ethics, sponsor, institution, or journal requirements apply.
Journal and registry integrity
A transparent journal screen, a downloadable decision record, and a Philippine registry workflow help researchers replace assumptions with evidence.
Interactive evidence record
Answer from independently checked evidence. “Unknown” is safer than guessing, and a high score never substitutes for judgment.
Record the aims-and-scope URL and the date checked.
Check for confusingly similar titles and copied branding.
Record the legal publisher, address, and working contact route.
Do not rely on a promise of unusually fast acceptance.
Check current institutional pages, not only the journal site.
Save the fee page or confirm that no fee applies.
Record the policy URLs and version or access date.
Search the named database directly; a logo is not evidence.
Check the DOI resolver and named preservation service.
Membership may not apply to every legitimate journal; mark unknown with a reason.
Preserve suspicious solicitation emails as part of the decision record.
Inspect several current articles, corrections, and publication dates.
Investigate every no or unknown response before a researcher-owned submission decision.
Philippine registry workflow
This guide points researchers to primary sources. It does not submit, amend, or certify a registry record on their behalf.
Determine whether the protocol must be prospectively registered and which ethics, sponsor, institution, or journal requirements apply.
The Philippine Health Research Registry is hosted through HERDIN. Check the live registry and current submission instructions directly.
Keep the registry entry aligned with the approved protocol, outcomes, sample, status, and amendments. Explain changes rather than silently rewriting history.
Retain the registry identifier, submission and approval dates, amendment trail, and the version used for the manuscript or journal submission.